LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: THE STATE AND PUBLIC LAW

I. Introduction: the new historical wisdom, the years from c. 1815 to 1860 as the creation of a market society with exchanges, prices, and cash transactions (the rules of capitalism) as the governing principles--what, if anything, was the role of law in creating or sustaining a commercialized market society--J.W. Hurst, law and the release of "creative energies" in the service of the "people"--Morton Hurwitz and law as the servant of capitalism or those with the most money and property--all related to the old Anatole France irony about what he labeled "bourgeois law."

Law as constitutive; law as reflective--judges as law-makers or law-finders--common law vs. positive law--public law vs. private law, and how both of the latter relate to economic development.

And also the essential and vital ingredient of creating a new nation that works and endures.

II. The Positive State and Economic development

1. From Hamiltonianism to American Plan: Tariffs, Banks, Internal Improvements.

2. The Separate States and the Promotion of Economic Growth: Turnpikes, Canals, Railroads, Chartered and Corporate Monopolies

III. The Courts and the Positive State

1. The New York Steamboat Monopoly (Gibbons v. Ogden)--the issues involved and how they are resolved--Chancellor Kent and the state's power to serve the public interest by privileging the rights of investments of risk-takers--the split opinion on New York's highest court and a reversal, and the logic behind it: what really serves the public interest?--John Marshall speaks for the Supreme Court and federal supremacy in the arena of interstate commerce--part of Marshall's will to create a truly effective, and also sovereign national state.

2. The Charles River Bridge Case and its Resolution (1837)--compare to steamboat monopoly case--what leads both the Massachusetts court and the Supreme Court to find against the original chartered monopoly? Again "free enterprise" liberated in the service of the public interest or commonwealth--why commonwealth principle so salient in the case of Massachusetts!

3. The Bank of the United States and McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)--summarize the complicated history of the Bank of the U.S. and its role in the economy--what the state of Maryland attempted to do, tax the bank out of existence--the double-edge of Marshall's finding: an elastic constitution adaptable to changing times, and the supremacy of national authority--states may not use their reserved powers to destroy the federal power.

4. Courts and the Law of Eminent Domain--what is the principle of eminent domain? How does the principle clash with the Constitution? The "takings clause," due process, and just compensation--How does the principle clash with the common law heritage? Undiminished or undiluted enjoyment and use of one's own property--why eminent domain so important to the creation of a marketplace, or capitalist, society: building an economic infrastructure: turnpikes, canals, railroads, and urban development--private property rights v. public benefit or community welfare--the favored resolution--and Wednesday we'll see how all this also relates to the private law of torts, liabilities, and negligence.

IV. The Decline of the Positive State

1. Andrew Jackson, the Bank War, and a Different View of Constitutionalism--another sort of release of creative energies, this time a new rule or law of unintended consequences.

2. The Depression of 1837, State Default, and Restrictive State Constitutions

3. General Incorporation Laws--explain the importance of corporations to economic development and the case for general laws.

4. Popular Election of State Appellate Judges--law-makers and the principle of popular sovereignty.

V. Conclusion: The Realities of a Marketplace Society--Most economic transactions occur in the private arena, not the public sphere, between private parties, not public officials, or the state and private parties--hence the common law becomes the central battleground in accommodating law to capitalism.